News

Controversial proposals for 'modernising' the traffic commissioner (TC) system have been published by the Department for Transport (DfT). The consultation largely discusses the future role of TCs in relation to PSV regulation, but industry insiders say there could be knock-on effects for goods vehicle operators. The first of two options proposed involves a virtually unchanged system except for a more statutory footing for the TC-elected senior traffic commissioner (STC). This power would, says  the DfT, promote "consistency across the network" and give the STC power to issue directions and guidance to the TCs.

But the second option proposes the creation of two new posts - director O-licensing and director bus - who would report to a newly-created Board of Traffic Commissioners. Option two also reveals that the DfT is "inclined" to introduce time-limited, reviewable contracts for any future TCs appointed. And while it says no change is envisaged for O-licensing arrangements, whereby VOSA staff provide TCs with administrative support and also issue licences in straightforward cases, it suggests an "alternative option would be to delegate the function of O-licensing direct to VOSA, with the TCs performing an appeals function".

A DfT spokesperson says: "The proposed Board of Traffic Commissioners would be responsible for ensuring that both goods vehicle and bus sectors get the attention and resources they deserve." James Hookham, Freight Transport Association director  of policy and deputy chief executive, says: "We will be studying the proposals with our members to check that the commissioners' judicial powers are protected." But Road Haulage Assoc-iation policy director Jack Semple adds: "We find it difficult to see how the idea of fixed-term contracts for TCs can protect their independence."

The DfT adds that under option two, TCs would "retain their wholly independent status in relation to their quasi judicial-making role".

STC Philip Brown declined to comment on the proposals.