« Today in Road Transport, 28 November 2007 | Main | Today in Road Transport, 29 November 2007 »

What the papers say on longer, heavier super trucks

An article in The Times on Monday has sparked off a huge amount of press coverage and reaction to longer heavier trucks and most of it is bad, even though The Times supported the idea.

The Daily Mail was particularly harsh, which is surprising as they normally support industry. But it’s comment was “They are the supertankers of the highway. Huge lorries called LHVs - longer, heavier vehicles - could soon be thundering along Britain's roads if the haulage industry gets its way. But do we want them?”


The Sun is believed to have opposed them but changed its mind after a journalist drove one. Sun writer Ken Gibson wrote: “But I reckon the super truck is well worth a spin. If I can drive one with relative ease, professional truckers would have no problem and the public have nothing to fear.” And there is a video of the Denby vehicle on the web site as well.


The Guardian is predictable opposed saying “Let's have no truck with them
The government is considering trials of a new 'super-lorry'. But nothing could be more disastrous.”

The Daily Telegraph is netural but does us the word juggernaut

See our full coverage on longer heavier super trucks

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.roadtransport.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/15679

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on November 28, 2007 4:47 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Today in Road Transport, 28 November 2007.

The next post in this blog is Today in Road Transport, 29 November 2007.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.