Whoops apocalypse....No# 6,930. 250-tonne Liebherr crane falls over in Sydney on Biglorryblog...

| 6 Comments | No TrackBacks
Craney081.jpg 

Biglorryblog's heart goes out to this Australian crane operator who apparently had only had this smart Liebherr 250-tonne crane worth a cool A$3m for nine-days before this happened....naturally BLB trusts the operators and site workers escaped without injury..(And if that's not the case let me know and I'll remove the blog).

Craney082.jpg.

It seems the supports gave way on the first floor and the crane balanced on the remaining panel for around an hour then fell right through to the basement. I'm told it happened on Friday Morning 26/09 in Sydney.

Craney083.jpg

You can clearly see where it's broken through the concrete layer here..

Craney084.jpg

But for the moment it's still suspended on top. Now click through here for more..and the ultimate sad end...

Craney085.jpg

Now it gets worse. I think I'd have just sat on the ground and cried...my lovely crane!

Craney086.jpg

And here's where it came to rest....of course the real question is how on earth do you recover it..not with aniother crane on the same roof....errr no. that won't do. perhaps someone has pictures of how they ultimately rescued it....and my thanks to Cam and his mates for passing the pictuires on to me. It only goes to show that bad news travels like a wildf-ire and good news travels slow...And once again if anyone was hurt then let me know and I'll take this down.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.roadtransport.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/36235

6 Comments

Did they [i]really[/i] think a crane of that size and mass would be safe on that flimsy roof? Its almost as though the crash was deliberate!

Peter Lynch

A crane of that size places a massive load on its outriggers and large timbers are normally used to spread this load.

Vic Hungerford

It looks as if the large timbers weren't large enough in this case, Pete! Just imagine the paperwork involved in the incident reports after that lot.

The second last photo clearly show that sole-boards were not used under the outrigger pads.

Not only that, there was not enough back-propping under the floor.

Back-propping on the floor below should be in position directly underneath the outriggers. However, if sole-boards were not used, "goodbye Charlie".

Peter Lynch

According to the Hill Shire Times, the crane driver received minor injuries and they are still working out how to remove the crane. An oxy torch, I suggest.

i have posted a link to an article giving some insight as to why the accident happnes and confirms the lack of serious injuries. it is not such a clear case of having no support under the outrigger leg. Quite interesting. The crane was removed using two mobiles, a 400 and a 200 T and i think it went back to Liebher for rebuild

Leave a comment

What a user pic? Get a Gravatar!

Categories

Truck of the Year

truck-of-the-year-small.jpg

BigLorryBlog editor Brian Weatherley is the UK jury member for the International Truck of the Year award

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID
Powered by Movable Type 4.31-en

Subscribe by E-mail

BLB Needs You!

Tags

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by BigLorryBlog published on October 2, 2008 7:24 AM.

More RFW references....Biglorryblog salutes the home-gown Aussie battler thanks to Cam! was the previous entry in this blog.

Without trucks...the UK can't deliver is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.